Automated Testing Software

Has always because I'm a business owner and I try to save money and make money I wish everything could be free but it can't be so there's not much to dislike Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It's solving my biggest Dilemma on which software to stick with if I had operating system if I want to stick with iOS and Mac or if I want to stick with Google and Android so far it would seem that I would like to stick with the iMac and IOS operating systems Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

In my opinion, the button that opens the browser console is in an unintuitive location, and it was hard to find it the first time.

If the user does not use the virtual device for about 2 or 3 minutes, he is automatically disconnected. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a software tester, I use LambdaTest to display websites on various browsers and mobile devices. It works great for testing whether websites are responsive and whether all elements are displayed correctly on the most popular browsers and mobile devices. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Their zapier integration is limited. We were attempting to completely automate our beta process leveraging Launch Darkly + Hubspot forms. We failed to do so because LD's zapier integration doesn't support Segments. We are exploring leveraging their public API to build a custom solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It has helped us do a few things better. 1. We manage alpha and beta releases more effectively. 2. We hav avoided massive outages by leveraging percentage based rollouts 3. It has helped us reduced the risk of launching large features or intiatives in our customer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For those who are not familiar with Git, at first, the learning curve can be a bit high. I still remember the first time I tried to set up a workflow using GitHub Actions, at that point programming was not my priority; I spent more time reading documentation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our entire development process now runs on GitHub. We can communicate without accidentally overwriting files, all changes are well documented, and the code is never lost because we use it. We can locate the source of a production issue because GitHub recorded every change we made. Without any drama, we simply examine the confirmations, identify the problem and solve it. It has also been very helpful for our security, we guarantee that there are no safety failures or defects in production, we do code reviews for each extraction request. The advantages outweigh the disadvantages considerably, despite some minor problems such as learning curve and limited integrations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I found it a little bit confusing to understand the pricing between accounts. I have a user account, with its own plan, that belongs to a company account, with its own plan. I have to really think about what I will be charged and on what plans the builds are registered to. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We now have automatic builds of our android and ios apps. We run tests on them and notify all developers if a build fails. If they succeed we share release and beta builds with testers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The application is only related to the test management if there's an automated tool installed then I don't think this would be helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The organization of thousands of test cases was one of the major issues we have faces during project deployments which has been solved by neat arrangement of test cases. This not only improves the efficiency but also solves the problem of dilemma among the testers. The ease of getting work done with fantastic test cases has also helped a lot. The way of organising the test cases in a well manner with reusable templates improves the efficiency and reduces problems. The seamless integration with jira or slack provides a great workflow. The analytics about test coverage and progress is amazing and very useful .The Creation detailed test cases using a WYSIWYG editor with rich-text formatting, allowing for clear and structured documentation helped a lot during system integration testing and UAT scenarios and will also be used in the future. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The configuration of default runners is unknown - unless we run a particular command like uname Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Prior to using gitlab, i was building my code on a VM. when the VM went down or the network was down I was stuck. Also space was a constraint on VM with multple users using to store their files and build code.

moving to gitlab and having multiple projects eased this situation.

Also with the concept of branches I could have multiple flavors and options to achieve different functionality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I didn't face any issues using TestFirst, but it doesn't have Mac support and some of our applications require to be tested on MacOS, so it's a limitation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use Jira-integrated TestFirst and link all our testing tasks with respective test cases. That helped to identify the areas lacking coverage because of the well-organized structure in TestFirst. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A full regression run can take a long time to complete and review. This is mainly due to our product's complex setup, which can cause other areas not to behave as expected during testing. This limits the number of concurrent tests that can run, which increases run times. I believe this is less an issue with QA Wolf's product than with the complexity of our product. However, as QA Wolf learns more about our product setup, the tests are getting better and more stable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

QA Wolf solves the continualy problem with any software updates, introduced regression bugs. They are great at implementing useful tests that have proven to quickly catch introduced regression bugs as we continue to update and improve our product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As with anything Metadata api based in Salesforce the system has to work around the complexities of the SalesForce object architecture. The data dictionary does take us a long way to getting past this however. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It gives us exact visibility into our customers Salesforce Orgs and helps us find the inflection points for our implementations. One example is an implementation that was hung up for 3 days on a problem, within 15 minutes of connecting sonar we worked past it. Its a lifesaver as is Brad and Kevin from their team. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I would really like to be able to link Test Cases as precondions or steps to follow, I know that we have "shared steps", if you have a Test Case that follows or has similar steps you will have to edit the Test Case and now the "shared steps", just to simplify things, allow to link Tests cases as steps of another Test Case, like we do in Jira, hehe, sorry to compare, but that's somethign I like from Jira, avoid complexity and time consuming when editing Test Cases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

For now, no problems, everything is fine. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only Dislike which i face is the Application history is not showing older than 4 months in the app but showing when we use in the browser. Which I want that that should give us the filter to fetch the particular date history, this will help massively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

This helps me to integrate around 20+ platforms with salesforce using REST API as well as Graphql API. Also it helps me to delete no used webhooks of any platform. Postman has ability to direclty change any record of Salesforce using Autorization and login.

Postman helps me to easy my work when I have to intergrate any platfrom I just google and run those APIs into Postman and tried to retireve data according to my requirements, and postman always helps me in those situations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'd want to see more updates in AI-driven test coverage analysis, but I can't think of anything significant at the moment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Our QA process no longer has bottlenecks thanks to ContextQA, which allows for quicker feedback loops and improved product delivery schedules. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

GCB is a great product but it is very expensive for my many clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It is useful when I have very specific needs and don't want to configure a Linux server by myself. It is also very useful in the development and testing stage so I can mainly focus on my software logic & structure. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- sometimes the pipelines takes too long to execute / respond (maybe due to downtime from azure side). Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- We use the azure pipelines to Deploy code in higher environments such as Test, Prod etc.

- Code promotion became easier and effortless due to DevOps pipelines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I am annoyed when I turn to the editing case every time I try to copy part of that case by double-clicking on them Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Simultaneous launching of automation test runs and manual test runs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm yet to come across any issues at all and therefore can't honestly find fault with the app. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Keeping track of changes and ensuring everything that gets sent to the production server is all built and ready is a pain without any tool like this and DeployHQ does it really well. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

However, the major disadvantage of Copado DevOps is that it is expensive and some small teams or companies may not be able to afford to use it. The resources necessary to leverage the platform to its full potential may not be in line with the company’s financial capabilities. Also unique is the fact that the platform is sometimes overcomplicated by its various features that can barely be managed without a team. This has sometimes led to our organization witnessing some form of unwarranted hold up accompanied by unnecessary price increment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are numerous issues that arise when it comes to the development and deployment of applications, and Copado DevOps has been helpful in their resolution. By continuously integrating and delivering, their manual work has been cut down and there are fewer chances of making mistakes in the deployment. This is has resulted into faster cycles and more credible software which has had an added advantage to our team since we are able to avoid spending considerable time solving problems of deployments. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While AutoRABIT is feature-rich, the initial setup and implementation can be somewhat complex, especially for organizations with less technical expertise. The user interface, though functional, could benefit from a more modern and intuitive design. At times, the platform's performance can be sluggish, particularly when dealing with large data sets or complex environments using Dataloader. Lastly, the pricing might be a bit steep for smaller teams or organizations with limited budgets, making it more suitable for mid to large-sized enterprises. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AutoRABIT addresses several key challenges in our Salesforce development lifecycle. Firstly, it simplifies and automates the deployment process, reducing the risk of manual errors and significantly speeding up release cycles. This has enabled our team to deploy changes more frequently and with greater confidence. Secondly, AutoRABIT's version control system ensures that all changes are tracked, making it easier to manage code conflicts and rollbacks if necessary. The platform’s robust backup and recovery features protect our data, ensuring business continuity even in the event of unexpected issues. Overall, AutoRABIT has streamlined our DevOps operations, improved efficiency, and enhanced the security of our Salesforce environment. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Context-Driven Approach: While ACCELQ’s context-driven approach to test automation is powerful, it requires careful planning. Without a well-structured approach, the element repository can become messy, leading to confusion and inefficiencies in managing test assets.

This is not the drawback of the tool however a mandatory process for better management. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I worked on a Proof of Concept (POC) for use cases specific to the Salesforce platform. ACCELQ proved to have great potential in automating test cases for a dynamic platform like Salesforce. To my surprise, I was able to automate the test cases faster than expected.

When the test scripts were revisited, they were found to be stable, requiring only minimal maintenance, which was effortless to handle. I efficiently utilized ACCELQ's locator-free identification feature, which added to the ease of automation.

Another standout feature was the tool’s intuitive nature—there was no significant learning curve. As I started using the tool, its user-friendly design made it easy to get familiar with its features.

For execution, I used a local agent. The execution process was not only fast but also unattended, requiring no separate effort or enablement. This made the automation experience seamless and efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.